Clarity Required in GST Anti-Profiteering Rules: CII

Image
Capital Market
Last Updated : Jan 11 2018 | 11:05 AM IST
With the National Anti-Profiteering Authority being established, the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) has called for greater clarity in rules to curb price increase arising from GST. Practical implementation of the regulations without ambiguity and without untoward scrutiny is required, particularly in the initial days of implementation till the system stabilizes, said a CII press release.

The anti-profiteering clause was necessitated to keep a check on unethical high profits, analyze long term effects of GST rollout, control price rise and retain consumer trust in the new tax regime. The rules say, benefit of input tax credit should have been passed on to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices." However, as this definition is not clear, discretionary bias may creep in, pointed out CII.

According to CII, several factors contribute to pricing decisions, such as supply and demand conditions, supplier's cost and taxes. Pre-GST and post-GST profits may be influenced also factors such as lower logistics costs and free flow of goods and services across states, elimination of certain taxes, and better efficiency. The anti-profiteering clause of GST law should provide clarity on rules and regulations regarding assessment of valuation and impact of taxes.

The anti-profiteering clause could lead to hardship for small enterprises in particular, note CII. There is concern that practical and procedural challenges may be faced during the initial implementation period of the anti-profiteering clause.

Tax authorities will need to be sensitive to natural business outcomes and avoid undue harassment. Also, the clause gives relatively less time for preparation and adoption of the new provisions.

Another challenge is complicated compliance. Government would need to compare cost of every product pre-GST and post-GST to determine the amount of tax benefit applicable. Manufacturers or suppliers may also deal in several products that are not distinguished in their accounting books, so that determining price margins for individual products will be difficult.

While the objective of the anti-profiteering rules is logical and industry is willing to comply, implementation is challenging. Effective anti-profiteering provisions that are clear are needed to ensure GST provides tax benefits to consumers, stressed CII.

Powered by Capital Market - Live News

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 11 2018 | 10:47 AM IST

Next Story