Explain coal blocks allocation method: SC

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 10 2013 | 8:30 PM IST

Pointing to "deficiencies", the Supreme Court Wednesday directed the central government to file an affidavit, along with supporting material, explaining the procedure adopted for the allocation of 164 coal blocks.

There was nothing on record and the screening committee which gave away the blocks went by subjective considerations, the court said, referring to "infirmities" in the process.

An apex court bench of Justice R.M. Lodha, Justice Madan B. Lokur and Justice Kurian Joseph gave the direction after perusing a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) status report about the on-going investigation into the coal blocks allocation.

The court said that "records are not available, detail minutes are not available, recommendations of the state government were changed midway and (in some cases allocations were made) against the recommendations of the state government".

In the report, the probe agency said the procedure adopted by the coal ministry and the screening committee for allocation of the coal blocks was arbitrary.

The CBI in its report, extracts of which were read in the court, said there was no material about the decision-making process and the minutes were either not maintained or were sketchy.

Saying that "there is nothing on record (on the allocation of coal blocks) ... the CBI is struggling", Justice Lodha read from the status report which said "no system is in place to scrutinise the application, minutes are non-speaking and sketchy...."

The court noted that there was no system of obtaining document.

The allocations were made even in the absence of the recommendation by the State government and decisions on allocations were changed midway, the judges said.

Referring to the "deficiencies" and "infirmities" in the process, the court noted that certain allocations were made not only in the absence of the recommendation of the state government but even in the absence of the administrative machinery.

Expressing concern over the decision making process, the court asked Attorney General G.E. Vahanvati "you must file a comprehensive affidavit on the allocation of all coal blocks along with the supporting documents".

The court's direction seeking details justifying the allocation of 164 coal blocks came after Vahanvati told the court that 132 coal blocks were allocated by the screening committee and 72 under government dispensation. He told the court that allocation of 40 coal blocks had been cancelled since then.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 10 2013 | 8:25 PM IST

Next Story