Have evidence of Gurung's involvement in violence, West Bengal tells SC

Image
IANS New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 30 2017 | 8:15 PM IST

The West Bengal government on Thursday told the Supreme Court that it has intelligence inputs including intercepts to back its charge of alleged involvement of Gorkha Janmukti Morcha leader Bimal Gurung in the violence during in Darjeeling and Kalimpong. the agitation for separate Gorkhaland state.

"We have intelligence inputs including telephone intercept to support our charge of his involvement in violence including the use of weapons like AK-47 during the agitation," senior counsel Kaspil Sibal told the bench of Justice A.K. Sikri and Justice Ashok Bhushan at the fag end of an hour long arguments.

Seeking the transfer of investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in 50 to 60 casses lodged against him by the West Bengal Police, Gurung told the court that the investigation by the state police is not going to partisan and justice becoming the victim.

"If feeling goes ... that I have been unfairly investigated and persecuted, it would create further unrest and in public interest it (investigation) must go to an outside agency," senior counsel P.S. Patwalia, appearing for Gurung, told the court citing several judgements of the top court where in similar situations, the court had handed over the investigations to the CBI.

Telling the court that different FIRs filed against his client were proforma FIRs with identical wording, he said Gurung would be chasing these cases these cases for next two decades and would be behind the bar for five to six years. The court was told that the state government was out to split the agitation for separate Gorkhas State.

But the court said that if they are proforma FIRs, then it would be in all the cases.

The top court, by its November 20 order, had said that "no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner (Bimal Gurung)" and the West Bengal Director General of Police later moved the top court to seek modification of the order.

Since the arguments by Patwalia were inconclusive, the court directed further hearing on December 4.

--IANS

pk/vd

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 30 2017 | 8:08 PM IST

Next Story