Researchers from Georgia Institute of Technology have discovered that 22 species of mammals, including humans, have eyelash length one-third the width of their eye that keeps the eyes healthy.
Anything shorter or longer, including the fake eyelashes that are popular in Hollywood and make-up aisles, increases airflow around the eye and leads to more dust hitting the surface.
"Eyelashes form a barrier to control airflow and the rate of evaporation on the surface of the cornea," said Guillermo Amador from George W. Woodruff school of mechanical engineering who authored the study.
"When eyelashes are shorter than the one-third ratio, they have only a slight effect on the flow. Their effect is more pronounced as they lengthen up until one-third. After that, they start funneling air and dust particles into the eye," he cautioned.
To reach this conclusion, Amador and the research team sent a student to the American Museum of Natural History in New York to measure eyes and eyelashes of various animals.
Aside from an elephant, which has extremely long eyelashes, every species studied had evolved to the same ratio of lash length to eye width.
The team then built the wind tunnel to re-create air flows on a mimic of an adult, human eye.
A four-millimetre deep, 20-millimetre diameter aluminium dish served as the cornea.
Mesh surrounded the dish to replicate the eyelashes.
They discovered the ideal ratio while varying the mesh length during evaporation and particle deposition studies.
"As short lashes grew longer, they reduced air flow, creating a layer of slow-moving air above the cornea," study co-author assistant professor David Hu noted.
This kept the eye moist for a longer time and kept particles away. The majority of air essentially hit the eyelashes and rolled away from the eye.
"This is why long, elegant, fake eyelashes are not ideal. They may look good, but they are not the best thing for the health of your eyes," the authors wrote.
The team also says the findings could be used to create eyelash-inspired filaments to protect solar panels, photographic sensors or autonomous robots in dusty environments.
The study was published in the Journal of the Royal Society Interface.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
