How many friends you can add to your social network?

Image
IANS Sydney
Last Updated : May 29 2016 | 4:22 PM IST

There is a limit to the maximum number of people you can choose to connect with in a social network, and that limit has largely remained unchanged since humans lived in hunter-gatherer societies over thousands of years ago, finds a new study.

"When you have got this network of relationships, there are a lot of things going on in that network. It takes a lot of brain power to actually socially navigate these large networks and there's an upper limit to our ability to do that," said study lead author Michael Harre from the University of Sydney.

Harre and colleague Mikhail Prokopenko have now calculated how that limit -- known as Dunbar's Number -- is reached.

"For humans the limit is around 132 individuals," Harre said.

The limit applies to small groups in both hunter-gatherer societies and modern societies where people are increasingly getting connected to one another using online social networking sites like Facebook, Linkedin and Twitter.

The study, published recently in the Royal Society journal Interface, however points out that you don't have to maintain relationships with everyone in the group for it to remain cohesive.

"To connect together a group of 132 individuals we estimate the average number of links each individual has to be able to maintain is between four and five," the researchers said.

According to the study, a person in a group of five such as a book club or group of friends needs to maintain an average of one to two links. A person in a group of 15 needs an average of two to three links, and a person in a group of 45 needs an average of three to four links.

"The strength of our result is in showing that it is sufficient to add just one connection per person on average while increasing the size of the group roughly three-fold," Prokopenko said.

It means you don't have to like or even be friends with people to co-operate with them -- as long as others in the group do.

"You only have to like enough people to bind the group together," he added.

This would have been important in the days when hunter-gatherers needed, say, 15 people to cooperate in the hunting of a mammoth.

"All you need to do is like two or three people in that group and that's adequate for you to go off and hunt with them," Prokopenko said.

--IANS

vr/kb/vt

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 29 2016 | 4:12 PM IST

Next Story