It’s hard to justify valuations for many of the auto stocks given that volumes for most haven’t really improved
Less than a month back industry watchers were wondering whether Maruti Suzuki would be able to sustain 70,000 units a month and whether Hero Honda would manage to grow by 8 per cent this year. Of course, auto stocks were climbing back from their March 2009 lows but opinion was divided on whether an Ashok Leyland would see an increase in sales of commercial vehicles this year.
Even a rise of 3 per cent for Ashok Leyland and Mahindra and Mahindra are confounding given that recent volume numbers have been nothing to write home about, although there may have been some improvement in the past few months. For sure, money is becoming cheaper and banks might just be willing open up the loan counters again.
But it’s not as though the economy is headed for even a 7 per cent growth this year—the consensus is somewhere at 6.5 per cent---and so it’s not clear yet that demand for trucks or three wheelers will bounce back so sharply.
In fact, Rajiv Bajaj said recently that he wasn’t sure consumer demand was really picking up that fast. And Tata Motors’ Ravi Kant too was circumspect when talking of the prospects for CVs this year saying the demand for the heavier trucks was still quite weak. Yes, Hero Honda has been doing brisk business but much of it is in the rural markets where consumers haven’t felt the pinch as much as their city cousins have.
Also, it’s the smaller 100 cc bikes that comprise the bulk of Hero Honda’s sales. though that really matt'een re-rated and the company is growing sales. Maruti’s valuations at around 17.5 times forward earnings too can’t really be justified even if one believes that that macroeconomic recovery is round the corner.
Also, subdued consolidated earnings for Tata Motors, courtesy possible losses at JLR, mean that the stock is clearly overpriced Rs 386---stand-alone earnings are expected to come in at around Rs12-13 per share, this year. Ashok Leyland trades at around 20 times forward earnings and doesn’t deserve a multiple higher than 13-14 times at best.
As for Bajaj Auto, it’s much too soon for the stock to get re-rated and the multiple of 17 times estimated 2009-10 earnings that it currently commands seems overdone.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
