Davos Man disappoints

World Economic Forum seems to be out of ideas

Image
Business Standard Editorial Comment
Last Updated : Jan 21 2017 | 8:45 PM IST
Events since the World Economic Forum meeting last year ensured that the world’s elite, who assembled at this year’s annual retreat in the Swiss Alps, continued to remain in a state of utter confusion. The world order that viewed economic globalisation and free market capitalism as the forces of good is on the verge of collapsing around the proverbial Davos men and women — people who extolled the virtues of trans-nationalism and argued against national boundaries. But the wildly unexpected results of Brexit and a Donald Trump’s victory in the US presidential elections have knocked the wind out of the sails of the Davos narrative. The annual retreat has always been a talking shop, a networking fest; yet each year it articulated a newer version of the central vision “dedicated to improving the state of the world”. This year, however, everybody was at a loss for words. 

Nothing better captures this apoplexy than the choice of 2017’s showstopper, Xi Jinping, the first Chinese president to address the WEF in Davos. China, notwithstanding its remarkable economic rise over the past decades and its success in lifting hundreds of millions out of poverty using the opportunities provided by globalisation, is the most unconvincing poster boy for the WEF’s values of universal openness and transparency as well as the limited role of the government. For the most part, the developed countries of the west and as well as China’s Asian rivals such as Japan have steered clear of accepting it as a “market economy”. Not surprisingly then, Mr Xi’s attempt at elucidating the merits of globalisation was symptomatic of the deep panic among business leaders of the world.

While leaders spent most of the time denying the harsh ramifications of rising nationalism, political populism and trade protectionism among the countries that were till yesterday the torch-bearers of globalisation, the truth is that this moment was in the making for a while. It started with the global financial crisis of 2008-09, which shattered the faith that the people had in the existing economic framework and its architects. Since then it has been downhill: global output growth has decelerated and the ratio of trade to global output has stagnated. Underscoring faltering trade and output growth has been the sharp fall in labour productivity in the US, Europe and Japan. Falling productivity reflected in smaller increases in income, even in countries such as the US, where the unemployment rate fell, and contributed to rising inequality across the developed world. It was only a matter of time that the resulting distrust in the forces of trade and globalisation would spill over into the political realm. It is that grassroots backlash, as evidenced by Brexit and Mr Trump’s election, which now threatens to bring down the whole edifice built over years of laying down rules of global co-operation.

It is true that the fruits of globalisation and trade have not been shared equitably, but turning back the clock — by countries becoming insular and protectionist or, worse, starting a trade war, as many fear might happen if Mr Trump takes his statements from the campaign trail and the inaugural speech too seriously — could be a case of the cure being worse than the disease. A sudden, unilateral reneging on the accepted rules of the game by any one partner could spark off retaliation and lead to further depressing job opportunities and exacerbating inequalities. As it is, Brexit has introduced enough uncertainty in the system and might just be the first of many such breakouts. 

It is here that this year’s WEF failed to step up to its role as the thought leader. There were many discussions on the angst of the middle class and the growing disparity and inequality in the world. All attendees had a view on rethinking capitalism and making it more inclusive, but no clear answers on how to go about it. It was strikingly symbolic that the Davos meet ended on the day that Mr Trump, whose chance of getting nominated was dismissed by the world’s elite at this annual shindig last year, took over.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story