Meanwhile, the Reserve Bank of India stepped in to staunch the flow with a couple of measures. It has increased the borrowing limits of the oil companies, easing their cash constraint. It has also permitted banks to treat the oil bonds as normal government securities, which increases the liquidity of the bonds and further helps the companies to raise cash. However, as legitimate as these measures may be, they merely address the symptoms and that too from a short-term perspective. Borrowing limits cannot be raised beyond a point, while an endless supply of oil bonds will simply raise the desired yield on them and make raising funds through them more costly. The measures may have bought the petroleum sector a little time, but that is all they can do. There simply is no alternative to a policy response, which addresses the root cause of the problem.
This means that, whatever else the government may do to mitigate its impact, the response has to be based on an increase in retail prices. This may be staggered, but each hike cannot be insubstantial. Even a partial adjustment must be large enough to simultaneously shore up the financial condition of the oil companies and induce consumers to use less oil. Impact mitigation may come in the form of reduced Customs duties on crude oil, but this is already quite low and, even if it is eliminated, will be far from offsetting the price increase. It will, further, aggravate an already deteriorating fiscal situation. It is in this context that the proposed cess on income tax needs to be viewed. At best, it can compensate the government for revenues lost in eliminating the Customs duties on crude oil and petroleum products. If compensation is the objective, there are probably more efficient ways to do it than imposing higher taxes on companies and individuals in a decelerating economy. The first thing that comes to mind is privatisation. The government can surely raise enough resources through strategic sales of equity in public enterprises (other than the oil companies!) to both offset the revenue loss and redeem some proportion of the outstanding oil bonds. Of course, time is of the essence; a combination of immediate and more time-consuming solutions may be the best bet.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
