It is quite likely that the impact will not be as severe as last year. However, it is worth recognising that both businesses and citizens have been subjected to a second shock even before most could recover from the first blow. It is also reasonable to argue that fiscal stimulus in terms of increasing government expenditure at this stage will not work because of restrictions on mobility. But this should not stop the Central government from extending relief to the most vulnerable sections as it did last year. Leaving everything to states would be both insensitive and short-sighted. It can also be termed selective use of fiscal federalism. States are at the forefront in fighting the pandemic and will need resources. Their own revenue would again be under pressure because of lower economic activity. However, their ability to borrow is restricted and states are expected to follow a steeper fiscal consolidation path.
States will now also need funds to procure vaccines. The Union government has opened up the vaccination programme. Accordingly, 50 per cent of supply will be available for state governments and the private sector. The Central government will lift 50 per cent of vaccines for its ongoing vaccination programme. In this context, it will be important for the Union government to clearly outline the supply pipeline and how it will be distributed among states. This will allow states to make procurement plans. Serum Institute of India has priced its vaccine at Rs 400 per dose for state governments and Rs 600 for the private sector. This could lead to a significant outflow for states, which have started complaining about how the unilateral decision would add a heavy burden on their finances already reeling under the stress of the pandemic.
Thus, support from the Central government would be important. There is no reason why the Union government cannot restart the distribution of free food grains to the most vulnerable sections. A lot of effort has gone into building the “one nation, one ration card” system. Availability of food might also prompt migrant labourers to stay back, which will reduce the risk of infection. The government could also contemplate extending credit lines to small and medium businesses like last year. The Reserve Bank of India provided significant support in 2020 but would not be able to repeat the same because of inflation concerns. Thus, the government would have to do more this time around. Besides, the Union government should work with states and support them in every possible way to augment medical infrastructure. To be sure, all this will increase cost for the Central government. But increasing infection and a delay in economic recovery would be more damaging.
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)