Great unravelling: Few pillars to support a crumbling Indian business order

Though some of the old guard continue to do well, other iconic businesses and businessmen are burning out rapidly, while most of our unicorns remain copycat entrepreneurs, writes T N Ninan

Image
T N Ninan
Last Updated : Feb 23 2019 | 8:16 AM IST
First there was Prompt Corrective Action for banks. Now we have it for businessmen. Anil Ambani’s group finds itself in virtual meltdown. Naresh Goyal is about to lose control of Jet Airways. Subhash Chandra of Zee is looking for a white knight. The Ruias have lost one flagship enterprise, and seem set to lose the other. In Kolkata, the BM Khaitan group is selling tea gardens and has put a company on the block. In Delhi, the Singh brothers after destroying their Ranbaxy inheritance are destroying each other. And in London, Vijay Mallya is trying desperately to keep a safe distance from the Arthur Road jail that has been spruced up in his honour.

Meanwhile, the great debt sell-off continues. Whether it is the airport titans GMR and GVK or financial sector giants like IL&FS and DHFL, or real estate stalwarts like DLF, they are all coping with the problems of past excess. Other over-ambitious creations of the go-go years, like the Bhushan companies and Lanco, have pretty much disappeared off the map. Rumours whirl in business circles about still hidden toxicities in the financial sector. This is a great unraveling.

The simple narrative had been public sector bad, and private sector good. Public sector still looks bad; consider Air-India, the Rs 48,000 crore to be pumped into government banks (on top of Rs 1.57 trillion already pumped in during just the last two years), and the bail-out that is round the corner for the government’s terminally ill telecom twins, BSNL and MTNL. But who will fly the flag now for India’s vaunted private sector, who are the primary authors of the balance sheet problems that have plagued banks, squeezed credit and slowed down the economy?

Many of the businessmen biting the dust are first-generation entrepreneurs, who could possibly earn some sympathy for having dreamed big. Still, the Ruias learned no lessons from having gone bankrupt once earlier in the 1990s. They and others gorged too much on debt, or under-estimated risk on commodity  price swings and long-gestation projects. Also, there are those who generated their initial capital by means that will not bear close scrutiny--the old story of businessmen flourishing while their companies went under. Now the fates of companies and promoters seem more closely intertwined, thanks to new rules. As for the high-flying second- or third-generation inheritors who mismanaged what they started with, the reaction they provoke in at least some circles must be schadenfreude.

Who is to take their place? Will a new generation of entrepreneurs start up with better business sense, or at least better luck? But the so-called unicorns are mostly copy-cat entrepreneurs whose cash flow is funded by overseas (including Chinese) money. Many of the billionaires thrown up by the tech services boom of an earlier era have turned to philanthropy. Some recent stars like Radhakishan Damani of DMart continue to flourish, while Dilip Shanghvi of Sun Pharmaceuticals has faded along with the pharma story, and Sunil Mittal has been sucked into the telecom tariff whirlpool. Indeed, a feature of the current scenario is that even rapidly growing sectors like telecom and aviation don’t generate surpluses. No wonder the stock market has been sluggish these past five years. One must hope there are hidden gems as yet unlisted.

Among the safe bets so far have been consumer-facing businesses in which Emami, Marico and others have done surprisingly well against the giants in the field. Emami strayed, though, and is now trying to reduce its debt load. Some established groups continue to do well—Bajaj, Mahindra, Piramal, Godrej and of course relentless Reliance. But Tata looks increasingly like a one-and-a-half company group, as old Bombay House stalwarts soak up capital.

Meanwhile, Suzuki has half the car market, the Chinese have the mobile phone business, and the Koreans key consumer durables segments. Deep-pocket investors like Blackstone and KKR have moved in, seeing opportunity. IBM is among the country’s largest employers, Honda has overtaken Hero, Diageo has bought out Mallya, the two largest private banks are basically foreign-owned, and Etihad may run Jet. Where would we be without the foreign players?!

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Disclaimer: These are personal views of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of www.business-standard.com or the Business Standard newspaper
Next Story