Warren Buffett: Warren Buffett’s succession plans have hit serious turbulence. The shock resignation of David Sokol, the chief executive of Berkshire Hathaway's NetJets airplane charter unit who was considered a prime candidate to run the whole shebang, highlights two huge obstacles to filling the Sage of Omaha’s wingtips. First, the candidate needs to be beyond reproach. Second, there may be better ways to make a pile of money.
Until today, Sokol had been a golden boy. Buffett praised him for the NetJets turnaround and the chattering classes put him at the top of the list of successors. His credentials seemed to have been burnished by bringing to Buffett's attention the charms of Lubrizol , the lubricants maker Berkshire said it would buy for $9.7 billion just two weeks ago.
As it turns out, Sokol had made personal trades in Lubrizol shares around the same time he was telling the company's bankers at Citigroup that Berkshire might have an interest in discussing a takeover. Though Buffett and Sokol believe no laws were broken — as Sokol ultimately had no vote in making a deal happen — the disclosure suggests Sokol personally profited to the tune of almost $3 million from a transaction he sold to Buffett.
But comparing Buffett’s account of Sokol’s trades with Lubrizol’s own rendering of events in its regulatory filings over the deal leaves many questions unanswered. Whether prosecutors or the Securities and Exchange Commission agree with the assessment of Buffett and Sokol remains to be seen. But if there's one certainty, any candidate to succeed Buffett cannot have engaged in behaviour that is even remotely questionable. Even assuming Sokol’s actions were above-board his own words suggest Buffett faces another hurdle in grooming his successor: money. In his resignation letter, Sokol cited a desire to “utilise the time remaining in my career to invest my family's resources in such a way as to create enduring equity value and hopefully an enterprise which will provide opportunity for my descendents and funding for my philanthropic interests.” In other words, he wanted to make more cash.
Whatever the case, the Lubrizol saga is likely to rumble on. At a time when the 80-year-old Buffett and his board should be putting the final touches on a succession plan, it's a good bet they will be tied up with a whole different set of discussions — with a lot of lawyers present.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
