However, that is the reality. Unfortunately, in a country which is in the election mode every year, such frequent periods of policy pause are costly. In principle, therefore, the PM’s call for simultaneous elections (or an alternative US-like system where there are two election cycles every four/five years) makes sense for an emerging economy that still needs continuous, uninterrupted policy change efforts. That said, is there a way the lull can be put to productive use? The answer is yes.
In the context of a general election, it is important to acknowledge that the actual time wasted in terms of policymaking may actually be more than three months. The fact is that the attention of the government in the quarter preceding the election announcement is usually focused on what may broadly be termed as populist measures. It is certainly not the time for challenging reforms. And often, post-election, the energies of a new government in the first three months is focused on personnel changes and planning an agenda for governance rather than on policy implementation.
It is imperative for a new government to hit the ground running especially in a scenario where growth prospects are still below full potential. Since the incumbent government strongly believes it has a very good shot at a second term, it must use the next two and half months to nudge the bureaucracy to work hard on policy blueprints so that several initiatives are ready to either be introduced in Parliament as legislation or to be announced as executive action in the month of June.
Those who are familiar with the working of the government would know that processes take inordinately long. There is, of course, the usual hierarchy of each ministry where files must pass from the lowest level to the highest level with each official adding his or her views on a proposal. Policy decisions also require consultations with other ministries that may have a stake. They require consultation with external stakeholders. In the case of legislations, they need careful drafting and vetting by the law ministry and legal officers of the government. It would be prudent to use the period of the model code of conduct to go through some of these processes on a few big ideas that the government would like to implement in its next term, rather than wait to begin in June.
At the very least, this could help build up a consensus within the bureaucracy on pending policy matters. At its best, it could enable a big bang first 100 days for the next government. There are cases where ordinances have been issued. These can be converted to legislation immediately in June. There are cases where policies have been announced, like the National Mineral Policy in the penultimate cabinet meeting of this government, but where implementation would require changes in existing legislation. The ministry concerned, the Ministry of Mines, should be ready with a draft amended legislation on June 1.
The effort would not be futile even if a different political formation assumes office. By and large, there is a policy continuum even if emphasis changes. The current NDA government took forward the goods and service tax, bankruptcy code and monetary policy framework (to name just three policies), on which work had been initiated by the previous government. Also, a new government would mean a change in personnel at the ministerial level and secretary level but most often the bulk of the bureaucracy isn’t changed immediately. They can be a source of readymade policy ideas for any new government.
Political capital for economic reform is highest in the first 12 months in office for any government, whether majority or minority. It must be used better than it has been in the past. Also, for all the mini-election cycles that will occur in the next five years, the incumbent central government must be strategic about using periods when the model code of conduct is in place to go through with the processes of policymaking. The substance must come before and after.
Time is money. An economy on the fast track cannot afford to waste it.
The author is chief economist, Vedanta
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)