Oil marketing companies: A long wait

Image
Vishal ChhabriaSunaina Vasudev Mumbai
Last Updated : Jan 20 2013 | 12:26 AM IST

A permanent and sustainable solution to the subsidy issue is the only way to ensure that these firms enjoy sound financial health.

The sound bites from different government quarters over proposals to compensate oil marketing companies (OMCs) for selling fuels below market price, as well as moving to a free-pricing mechanism for auto fuels, are positive. Not surprisingly, OMC stocks have outperformed the broader markets in the last one month. However, unless the proposals are implemented, it will not lower the financial pressure the OMCs are facing currently.

Consider this: the total loss on account of selling fuels below market price is estimated at Rs 45,000-50,000 crore for 2009-10. While ONGC, GAIL and Oil India compensate OMCs for losses on auto fuels (through discounts), nearly half the total loss (mainly on kerosene and LPG) is compensated by the government in the form of oil bonds.

The lack of compensation from the government has led to OMCs reporting a dip in profitability in September 2009 quarter. As per the Petroleum Minister, the under-recoveries on kerosene and LPG for first three quarters of 2009-10 were Rs 20,871 crore. No wonder, for September quarter, while Indian Oil (IOC) reported a meagre net profit of Rs 284 crore, HPCL and BPCL reported losses of Rs 159 crore and Rs 137 crore, respectively. This is in contrast to net profits of Rs 3,683 crore, Rs 649 crore and Rs 614 crore reported by IOC, HPCL and BPCL, respectively in June 2009 quarter.

Notably, the OMCs have not paid any advance tax due on December 15, which indicates their state of financial health. And, if they don’t receive the compensation by March 2010, it may lead to their first-ever annual loss in many years.

For now, since the ministry of finance skipped the provisioning for oil bonds in the supplementary to the Budget that was approved by Parliament last week, OMCs may have to wait for some more time before they receive any compensation. On the other hand, very recently, the Finance Secretary mentioned about the possibility of compensating the OMCs by giving them cash (instead of bonds). If the proposal gets cleared, the cash would be provided before March 31 2009.

The point, however, is that the delay in providing compensation is costing OMCs dearly. To the least, OMCs have to bear the cost of drawing funds from various agencies till they repay it back from the compensation they receive. So, whatever is the form of compensation, the government needs to act fast and come up with a permanent and transparent solution to the subsidy issue.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 25 2009 | 12:16 AM IST

Next Story