For the banking aficionados this will quickly morph into discussions about risk-based supervision of banks—and how this is where the problem is and why it needs to be strengthened. There will be talk of audit failure. Astonishingly the government-owned banks have numerous audits: concurrent audit, internal audit, statutory audit and then one by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The CAG may also somehow be in this mix—though I am not sure. PNB says it has a credit audit, risk-based internal audit, revenue audit, information systems audit, snap audit, segment audit, compliance audit, legal audit, Fema audit. This list ends with “etc.” (from sheer exhaustion of listing the various audits, I guess). So clearly one more audit is not likely to help. Is it that PSUs don’t pay their auditors fair wages, and so get mediocre service? Just the contrary. PSU bank auditors, in the aggregate, are paid much more than those minding private sector banks. PNB paid its auditors Rs 670 million for FY 2017, State Bank of India (SBI) a whopping Rs 2,161 million, while HDFC Bank, the lodestone for managing risk, spends just Rs 218 million (and Rs 257 million if you include certification). Both the amounts, HDFC Bank sheepishly admits, includes taxes. So powerful is the auditors’ lobby, that former President Pranab Mukherjee, when politically at his most powerful, is purported to have refused to intervene regarding audit fees in PSU banks, as being too sensitive even for him.