PNB scam: Why do we not talk about the whopping bank loan defaults?

It's high time CFOs pull their socks and perform fearlessly

Punjab National Bank
Mrutyunjaya Mohanty
Last Updated : Mar 23 2018 | 5:58 AM IST
The fraud at Punjab National Bank (PNB) has aroused a lot of indignation and angst. The amount in question is Rs 130 billion, a measly sum compared to banks’ non-performing assets (NPAs) of Rs 8.5 trillion. Of the NPAs, the top 12 stressed assets account for Rs 2.5 trillion while 488 defaulting companies make up the rest.
 
Then, why are these loan-defaulting companies’ promoters not being called fraudsters? In our eyes, these are shown simply as loan defaults or NPAs. In the PNB case, everyone—from the government to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to the PNB management—is indulging in the blame game and the company’s management is denying any wrongdoing.
 
As it has been in the past, this time too, the employees will be made the scapegoat while the promoters escape. Considering the slowness of the legal system, it would be a surprise if they are punished.
 
Why do public sector banks (PSBs) have most of the bad loans? Does the government not intervene in their functioning? Why are proper processes not followed before loans are sanctioned? Why is the liquidation value of these assets very low compared to net asset values? Why do bank managements ignore the red flag raised by statutory auditors and the rating agencies? Questions are many but no concrete answers are available.
 
Typically, a bank goes through several audits such as statutory audit, internal audit, concurrent audit, Reserve Bank audit, stock audit, and so on. Why can’t auditors spot lapses? It is surprising that despite half-a-dozen auditors and surveillance agencies and the IT system, fraudulent activities continue for years on end.
 
Why do our chief financial officers (CFOs) not act in the way their job demands? A few instances bring shame to the profession. It’s high time CFOs pulled up their socks and performed fearlessly. Their performance in a financial control mechanism should be such that while the management sweats, the organisation runs seamlessly.

It is surprising that internal control was missing in the PNB case. Didn’t we learn from the global slump due to the Lehman Brothers fallout in 2008? If the US and other developed countries can tighten their financial control systems by implementing the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, why can’t our corporate governance system work? Had it been effective, we may not have had so many financial frauds like those in PNB, Rotomac, Fortis Healthcare, and RP Info System. Most importantly, we may not have bad loans in such large numbers and of such large magnitudes.
 
We have had several futile attempts at resolutions of bad loans. Finally, the government and the RBI simplified the debt resolution process through the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The bad loan resolution process is very active now.
 
It seems everyone is happy with the bad loan resolution process, from the lenders to the RBI to the government and, of course, the promoters. Do we need to rejoice? At whose cost? At the cost of taxpayers of the salaried class?
 
We would be lucky if we could recover 40-50 per cent of the bad loans. During 2015-17, the average recovery ratio of Indian banks was 26.4 per cent, wherein the recovery rate for private banks was at 41 per cent while it was 25.1 per cent for PSBs. Moreover, this 26.4 per cent recovery is based on the current prices of the loans taken in the past (say, five years). If we factor in the WPI inflation rate of an average of 5.68 per cent per annum, the effective estimated recovery is just 21.91 per cent.
 
If this turmoil continues in banking, we are headed for a financial crisis. Thanks to our finance minister, a series of measures has been taken, the prominent of those being bringing in legislation to punish economic offenders with retrospective effect. The Fugitive Economic Offenders Bill, once signed into law, will provide for attaching properties of fraudsters both in India and outside.
 
We need to wait to see how effective the Bill becomes. And its effectiveness will be an eye-opener for the next corporate borrowers and hopefully we will be able to streamline our lending system. The author is the founder & managing partner of MSQUARE Management Consulting Services LLP. The views are personal

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story