A major reason for the drying up of financial flows into smaller enterprises is the breakdown of the state financial corporation framework, which was the channel through which IDBI and Sidbi operated. The basic capabilities needed to assess viability and risks of small and medium enterprises withered. Commercial banks stepped in to some extent; but by fiat of the priority sector requirements rather than by commercial attractiveness. This has been the prevailing situation for perhaps a decade and a half. So how might the Mudra Bank strategy address this? Clearly, the old channels are defunct and there is no point in trying to reactivate them. However, a whole range of new primary lending models have emerged, best reflected in the rapid expansion of micro-finance institutions, or MFIs. These are doing exactly what small and medium enterprises need; by virtue of their ground-level operations, they are well placed to evaluate business models that are primarily servicing local markets, both in terms of viability and risk. In fact, the new model of the small finance bank, which is what MFIs are expected to morph into, is actually the ideal channel through which the refinance operations of Mudra Bank can provide resources to small and medium enterprises. In an ideal state, the setting up of the Mudra Bank as an entity distinct from Sidbi, which should happen as soon as possible, will become the financial backstop for the small finance bank segment as well as other primary lenders who are closely connected to the small and medium enterprises domain.
Properly done, refinancing is a very effective method of expanding resource flows to any activity. And tapping into the MFI channel, which has emerged organically, is the best way to do it in India's current context. But this comes with responsibilities and risks for the new institution as well. A large number of small primary lenders will require significant investments in monitoring and compliance. Internal mechanisms for risk assessment and mitigation will need to be built up very quickly, if the capital base is not to be eroded by non-performing assets. For the model to work, close engagement between the refinancer and the primary lenders is essential. That should be the focus.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
