Run aground

China veto is wake-up call for world's dealmakers

Image
Ethan Bilby
Last Updated : Jun 18 2014 | 10:20 PM IST
Chinese regulators have sunk their first overseas transaction, killing a container-shipping alliance led by Denmark's Maersk. The particular national interest made this tie-up especially vulnerable. But there's a real risk China could torpedo other global deals.

Antitrust blocks from China are rare. Though Beijing has made acquirers like Glencore wait months and agree concessions to win approval, this is the first time the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) has denied a deal between non-Chinese firms. And it's only the second-ever "no" since the regulator blocked Coca-Cola's attempt to purchase juice-maker Huiyuan in 2009. This is a reminder of the wide-ranging powers granted under China's refreshed competition law six years ago. None of the parties to the deal were Chinese. But groups need only make $64 million in annual sales in the People's Republic to face scrutiny.

Based on MOFCOM's terse announcement, the decision seems justifiable. Maersk wanted to cut costs by sharing ships with Switzerland's Mediterranean Shipping and France's CMA CGM. But Chinese shipping associations balked at the proposed "P3" network, fearing future price-fixing. MOFCOM concurred, saying the tie-up would have raised the groups' control of the vital Asia-Europe route to levels that would stifle competition and harm the public interest.

There was an important wrinkle here. Chinese rules are stricter than US or EU laws on classing some industry alliances as mergers. The P3 network sidestepped formal merger reviews in Brussels and Washington.

But Chinese law also allows authorities to look more widely at the industrial consequences. The P3 alliance would have transformed a sector that houses big Chinese players such as COSCO and China Shipping. Moreover, as the world's largest goods trading nation, with $4.16 trillion of exports and imports in 2013, China has an obvious interest in ensuring global trade stays cheap. For dealmakers, the denial is a shot across the bows just as mergers and acquisitions activity takes off. Global M&A is up 68 per cent in the year to date, at $1.51 trillion, according to Thomson Reuters data. Other tie-ups such as Holcim-Lafarge are awaiting clearance. And, MOFCOM has proved it isn't afraid to capsize deals it doesn't like.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 18 2014 | 9:32 PM IST

Next Story