When a person develops a strong opinion about the future of a stock price, what is the most profitable way to express that view? It seems natural that the stock futures will be the venue of choice because the gains from successful price forecasting will be magnified through leverage. If Rs 100 is put in the spot market, and there is a successful forecast of a 10 per cent price rise, this is a gain of Rs 10. But if the same Rs 100 is put in the stock futures market, this may yield a position of about Rs 400, and a successful forecast of a 10 per cent price rise will give a gain of Rs 40, or 40 per cent.
By this reasoning, we would expect sophisticated forecasters to shun the spot market and favour the stock futures market. The reality has proved to be quite complicated. In most countries, the individual stock futures market is not too liquid, so the gains from leverage are offset by higher costs of transacting. Many important classes of institutional investors trade only on the spot market, so their work in price forecasting feeds into the spot price and not the futures price.
There is a nice concept of “information share” (IS), which permits the analysis of two markets to understand where the new information appeared. Studies in many countries, outside India, have shown that the IS of the stock futures is quite low — about 20 per cent.
Their first finding is that on average, in India, about half the price discovery takes place on the stock futures market and about half takes place on the spot. This value of 50 per cent information share is larger than what we see elsewhere in the world as the single stock futures market has succeeded in India while this has not happened in many other places.
The second finding is that the IS of the stock futures goes up to 55 per cent on news-intensive days. The role in price discovery of the stock futures market goes up at times when news breaks, which is probably when more speculative trading takes place.
The third finding is that when news-intensive days have bad news, the IS of the stock futures market goes up to 60 per cent. This may relate to the difficulties in short selling, which afflict the Indian equity spot market, given the lack of a well-functioning stock lending programme. When a price forecaster has a negative view to express, there is a greater bias in favour of putting the trade on the stock futures market.
The fourth finding is that for these features to work out, liquidity in the stock futures market is a pre-requisite. The stock futures market has to first succeed. If the stock futures market is not liquid in the first place, the cost of trading overwhelms the gains from leverage, and the stock futures market is not important in price discovery. When we look at an Indian stock where the stock futures market is not liquid, this is perhaps similar to the conditions seen in many countries, where stock futures trading has not succeeded, and the IS of the stock futures has languished at about 20 per cent.
Price discovery in the modern world is often quite complicated, with many trading venues, many instruments, geographical distance and time zone differences. The Indian setting is a unique and clean measurement opportunity, where the stock options trading is not too important, and we observe clean data for a spot price and a stock futures price. This makes the evidence particularly compelling.
Critics of financial markets often complain about derivatives trading activities. It is argued that these markets consume the time and focus of finance practitioners but do not contribute to the working of financial markets. Derivatives trading contributes to the system of financial markets in three ways: By giving tools for risk management, by contributing to more liquid markets, and by giving a forum where people who forecast prices can efficiently express their views.
If we visualise trading in (say) Infosys with and without a liquid stock futures contract, how would things change? With a liquid stock futures contract, the returns to price forecasting become higher. Successful forecasters would gain from leverage, and get a higher return on their expenditures in price forecasting. This would attract higher expenditures by finance practitioners to peer into the future of Infosys and forecast the price. This would improve market efficiency: The extent to which the price as seen in the market impounds sophisticated forecasts about the future of the company.
Conversely, if liquid stock futures in Infosys were switched off, expenditures on research and forecasting would be less justified, given the simple unleveraged returns. The scale of expenditures on understanding Infosys and forecasting its future would go down. The price would contain less information; it would be a less efficient market.
The writer is a professor at National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, New Delhi
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)