Targets with teeth

Boardroom gender quotas have hidden value

Image
Una Galani
Last Updated : Mar 09 2016 | 9:47 PM IST
Boardroom gender quotas are not a cure-all. A new global study has found that forcing companies to put more women on boards hasn't helped to redress the gender imbalance among senior executives. It adds to the growing body of evidence which suggests that mandating change at the top doesn't have a trickledown effect. Yet that's no reason to dismiss the idea entirely.

The study of 1,071 companies across six continents by the Cambridge Judge Business School found a big disconnect between the number of women in the boardroom and those in other executive positions. Take Norway, which introduced a 40 per cent female quota for boards back in 2003: women made up just 15 per cent of executive teams at companies covered by the report. That's a lower percentage than in Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand, none of which have minimum requirements for female directors.

Compulsory rules have also been tarnished by tokenism. Last year, Indian tycoons responded to a requirement that they have at least one female board member by appointing wives and even stepmothers as directors. For accomplished professional women, quotas can feed the perception that their promotions are an exercise in box-ticking rather being based on merit.

Yet for all their flaws, quotas are bringing more balance to the boardroom. From Germany to Malaysia, companies that were stuck in the dark ages are being forced to change. The implicit threat of quotas is also a big reason why voluntary targets in countries like the United Kingdom and Australia have been surprisingly successful in encouraging companies to appoint more female directors.

The Cambridge Judge study suggests other ways of boosting the number of women in the executive suite: countries could enshrine gender diversity requirements in corporate governance codes, and set term limits for directors. More widely, employers must rethink their approach to the division of responsibility when it comes to caring for children and other relatives.

The reality is that there is no single solution to bringing gender equality to the workplace. Quotas and targets focusing on the boardroom are just the start. But that is no reason to abandon them.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 09 2016 | 9:31 PM IST

Next Story