As interest rates rise, analysts expect an end to the benign asset quality cycle.
Banks seem to have fallen out of favour with investors and brokerages. After having delivered great returns last financial year, the sector is now coming under intense scrutiny of analysts. Several brokerages are advising clients to go easy on the sector, as return on assets and return on equity are likely to be capped. Given that rates are up 400 basis points from their lows, all eyes are now shifting to asset quality. The slowdown is likely to affect balance sheets of many companies.
A big reason for this negative view on banking is exposure to the power sector. Over the past three years, bank loans to this sector have grown 3x to $57 billion. Exposure of banks to this sector stands at 10 per cent of total loans. Analysts expect restructuring of some of these loans over the next 18 months.
Ambit Capital has undertaken a forensic accounting methodology to analyse on-and off balance sheet risks and the extent of profit and loss discretion they are exercising. The brokerage has found that amongst the new private sector banks, Axis Bank and YES Bank look exposed and Bank of Baroda stands out as the least risky. The findings show NPAs in the system are seldom reported as they should be. In particular, portfolio ever-greening and regulatory concessions tend to be used frequently to under-report NPAs. “Hence, the banking system’s reported numbers flatter to deceive. Further, based on our discussions with banks and based on the stories some of the banks have sold to our shareholders, we believe banks are adept at painting a rosier picture of their credit quality than the underlying reality.”
The NPA disconnect with reality begins with a bank’s attempts to prevent a borrower account from slipping into the NPA category through evergreening or through perpetual restructuring (tantamount to evergreening). Interspersed in the system are also banks that lack the capacity and perhaps even the willingness to identify NPAs in a systematic manner, resulting in a high proportion of discretion being exercised, especially in small-ticket loans that typically get shoved under the carpet. In turbulent times like these, investors no longer want to take risks of this nature.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
