The Congress Vice-President came and vowed what the villagers were waiting for. “The Congress party and I stand by you,” Rahul Gandhi told villagers gathered at Madanpur, which had been the epicenter of people’s protest against the coal mines under the Hasdeo-Arand coalfields in Chhattisgarh’s Korba district. They would not retreat from the stand, he committed.
The villagers were anticipating that their protest would get a stamp at the national level and Rahul Gandhi did not disappoint them, Ekka—a resident of Morga—said.
Her village is one of the 30 villages that would “vanish” once the 20 coal blocks identified in the coalfields had been allotted. The entire Hasdeo Arand region was classified as No-Go for mining in 2010—the only coalfields in India that was entirely mentioned as No-Go.
In the new process, seven blocks in the coalfields that has estimated reserves of 5.53 billion tonnes had been allotted/auctioned. Of the blocks, three are operational—the Chotia mines bagged by Balco from Prakash Industries and two allotted to Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Nigam Limited that had been operated by Adani Mining under Mines developer and operator (MDO) model. Three had been allotted to Chhattisgarh Power Generation Company while one in Tara was withheld after Jindal bagged it in auction.
ALSO READ: Rahul on Chhattisgarh visit from tomorrow, to take up farmers' issues
“We would prefer to lay down our life than giving away the land for coal mining,” Chandravati of Paturia village told Rahul Gandhi who reached Madanpur Monday afternoon on his two-day state visit to meet the forest dwellers and villagers bearing the brunt of coal mining in Hasdeo-Arand coalfields and power projects. Forests had been the source of earning for the tribals as they sell forest produces, she said, adding that even they had been depended on medicinal herbs to cure minor ailments.
ALSO READ: Odisha, Chhattisgarh, MP line up mines for auction
Rahul Gandhi said the Congress party would not draw the plan that would make industrialists to prosper and the tribals giving away their land to struggle. If the development took place, it would ensure that the interest of the tribals was protected and those giving away the land would not reduce to mere labourers, he added.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)