8 cops accused of raping minors denied bail by HC

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Feb 24 2015 | 4:25 PM IST
The Madras High Court has dismissed the anticipatory bail pleas filed by eight police personnel allegedly involved in sexually assaulting two minor girls in Puducherry, saying they have been charged with a "heinous" offence and acting as "vultures in uniform".
Refusing their pleas yesterday, Justice P Devadass observed that the accused command lot of influence and have "men, money and material" at their disposal which they can misuse.
"They were accused of having committed rape on two minor girls which is heinous and inhuman act.
"They were stated to be vultures in police uniform. Very grave accusations are made against them. The victims have identified the petitioners in a identification parade. There are information that an inspector of police over phone threatened the victim girls," he said.
Two minor girls were rescued from a prostitution racket in April last year. The victims approached the Child Welfare Committee and told them that some police officials were also part of the racket, following which cases were booked against them under the provisions of Protection of Child from Sexual Offences and also under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act 1956.
The case was transferred to the CB-CID and in an identification parade conducted through video conferencing as per the directives of the Madras High Court, the victims identified the culprits.
After booking cases against nine police personnel, they were suspended. They were absconding after booking the cases.
While one of them retired from service, the remaining police personnel, including two inspectors were dismissed from service.
"The petitioners are not ordinary persons. They are having long experience of criminal law, they know many hideouts and escape routes. They command lot of influence and have men, money and material at their disposal. They have the propensity and ability to overawe the poor victim girls.
"Possibility of they interfering with investigation cannot be ruled out. There are incriminating materials which are required to be probed through custodial interrogation", the judge said refusing their anticipatory bail pleas.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 24 2015 | 4:25 PM IST

Next Story