Appeal against PIO LA for denying information under RTI: JKNPP

Image
Press Trust of India Jammu
Last Updated : Oct 17 2017 | 10:48 PM IST
Claiming denial of information about property details of a BJP MLA under the RTI Act, Jammu and Kashmir National Pathers Party (JKNPP) today said an appeal has been filed against the Public Information Officer (PIO) of the Legislative Assembly in this onnection.
JKNPP chairman and former minister Harsh Dev Singh said he had moved an RTI application seeking the property statements of a BJP legislator from January 2015 onwards.
"The PIO, assembly secretariat, in response to the RTI has stated that the information pertained to third party and hence could not be provided without the consent of the MLA," Singh said in a statement here.
Without naming the BJP legislator, Singh expressed dismay over the refusal of the assembly secretariat to provide the MLA's property details and accused the government of making the most "contemptuous mockery of the slogans of transparency, accountability and good governance".
Describing the reply as "highly opprobrious and violation of the RTI Act", he said former MLAs had not only put their assets in public domain but the public was having full access into their property details which were provided by the assembly secretariat "without any hitch" or seeking consent of members.
"Have the rules been changed with regard to disclosure of assets by public men after the takeover of the PDP-BJP coalition?" he asked.
Singh said he has filed an appeal against the PIO legislative assembly for "concealment of property details of the MLA and for giving a baseless reason for denying the information sought under the RTI".
He said the tall slogans of the government on transparency and voluntary disclosures of assets of its leaders are just an "eye wash".
"The refusal to provide the asset details of its MLAs is not only gross violation of propriety and rule of law but also takes sheen off the anti-corruption slogans of the government," he said.
He said the property details "disallowed by the assembly secretariat pertained to an MLA who had raised a fully furnished palatial bungalow besides other moveable and immovable assets after his election as MLA despite the fact that he had publically claimed to be having only Rs 15,000 as cash and at bank".

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 17 2017 | 10:48 PM IST

Next Story