British MPs reject controversial right to die bill

Image
AFP London
Last Updated : Sep 11 2015 | 9:02 PM IST
A British bill to allow some terminally ill patients to end their lives was rejected today after it sparked fierce opposition from religious leaders and rival protests outside parliament.
In the first vote on the issue in 20 years, 330 lawmakers voted against the backbencher-proposed bill while only 118 backed the proposals.
Prime Minister David Cameron was against the bill.
If passed, the Assisted Dying Bill would have allowed doctors to help terminally ill adults diagnosed with less than six months left to live end their life, at the patient's request.
In rival protests outside parliament in London, around 200 campaigners came out in favour of the bill and there were dozens of protesters against it.
"82 Per cent of Britons Support Assisted Dying and the Current Law is Broken: Fix It!" read placards held up by supporters, while opponents' signs read: "Do No Harm. Vote No" and "Assist Us to Live, Not Die".
Sarah Wootton, chief executive of Dignity in Dying, said the vote showed that MPs were "ridiculously out of touch" with the British public on the issue.
"Suffering will continue as long as MPs turn a blind eye to dying people's wishes," she said.
But Peter Saunders, director of the Care Not Killing campaign, said: "They have done this because they have witnessed mission creep in the tiny number of places that have changed the law to allow assisted suicide and euthanasia."
Anglican leader Justin Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury, and the heads of all of Britain's main faith groups wrote a joint letter to MPs last week urging them to throw out the assisted dying bill.
"While it is not a crime in the UK for someone to take his or her own life, we recognise that it is a tragedy and we, rightly, do all that we can to prevent suicide.
"The assisted dying bill requires us to turn this stance on its head, not merely legitimising suicide, but actively supporting it," they said.
Under the plans, two doctors and a family court judge would have had to assess the patient's prognosis and confirm they were mentally competent and made the decision free from coercion.
The patient would still have had to administer the lethal medication themselves.
In today's vote, MPs were free to vote according to their conscience and the parties did not impose a whip or party line, as would usually be the case.
Assisted suicide is legal in Switzerland, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg as well as in the US states of Vermont, Oregon and Washington.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 11 2015 | 9:02 PM IST

Next Story