BSE stock options: Sebi fines 4 entities Rs 22 lakh for fraudulent trade

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 22 2019 | 10:01 PM IST

Markets regulator Sebi Wednesday imposed a total fine of over Rs 22 lakh on four entities for executing fraudulent and manipulative trades in the illiquid stock options segment of BSE.

The entities facing the penalty are -- Shristi Ispat and Alloys Ltd, Sri Narayan Mercantiles, Tarang Stock Broking Services and Abhinandan Vanijya Pvt Ltd -- according to Sebi's separate orders.

While Sri Narayan, Shristi Ispat and Abhinandan Vanijya were fined Rs 5 lakh each, Tarang Stock was levied a fine of Rs 7.5 lakh, totalling Rs 22.5 lakh.

After observing large scale reversal of trades in stock options segment of the bourse, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) conducted an investigation between April 2014 and September 2015.

The probe found that around 81 per cent of all the trades executed in the segment were non-genuine in nature and the four firms were among the various entities that executed such trades by reversing trades with same entities on the same day with wide variation of price.

The four entities "by engaging in such non-genuine transactions, created a misleading impression of trading in respective contracts while dealing in stock options contracts in a fraudulent manner," Sebi noted.

By doing so, the entities violated PFUTP (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) norms and the violation warrants imposition of monetary penalty, Sebi said.

In a separate order, Sebi levied a fine of Rs 10 lakh on Goldline International Finvest for failing to provide information sought by the regulator in the matter of Channel Nine Entertainment Ltd.

Sebi had sought information from Goldline with regard to receiving IPO (Initial Public Offering) proceeds of Channel Nine.

However, Goldline failed to provide information and also failed to reply to the summons issued by investigating authority after seeking extension of time, Sebi said.

"Such blatant non-submission with complete disregard to the sensitive nature of investigation in the matter of IPO constituting non-compliance of... summons cannot be viewed leniently," the regulator said while imposing fine.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 22 2019 | 10:00 PM IST

Next Story