Cash-for-vote scam: Arguments on framing of charge begin

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 26 2013 | 7:15 PM IST
Nearly five years after the cash-for-vote scam took place, the prosecution today began its arguments on framing of charges against former Samajwadi Party leader Amar Singh, Sudheendra Kulkarni, BJP leader L K Advani's former aide, BJP MP Ashok Argal and four others accused in the case.
Two former BJP MPs Faggan Singh Kulaste and Mahabir Singh Bhagora, Suhail Hindustani, Sanjeev Saxena, Amar Singh's former aide , are also accused in the case.
Appearing before Special Judge Narottam Kaushal, Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said "the argument that the entire thing was a sting is not correct."
On the role of Hindustani, the SG said, "As far as Hindustani is concerned, it is quite clear that he was the main conspirator and he was the one who got in touch with vulnerable BJP Party leaders."
Hindustani met S P Gupta, Aman Arora and Lovely Singh (all cited as prosecution witness) and offered names of the three BJP MPs, Parasaran said, adding that he met Kulkarni and they conspired to contact the news channel to do a sting.
On Kulkarni's role, he submitted, "Their argument is that entire thing was sting. But no..Kulkarni had twin objects, one was the sting operation and other was the bribe."
The court was also told that it was on Kulkarni's directions that Hindustani started contacting people in Samajwadi Party.
As the SG narrated the sequence of events of various meetings between the accused persons and their movement, the defence objected to the same and contended that the prosecution cannot describe the scenes on its own when it is their in the CD. At this, a part of the CD was played in the court.
The SG also said BJP MPs Argal, Kulaste and Bhagora fall under the same category and had the entire episode been a sting, they would have informed the law enforcement agency.
On Saxena, the prosecution said, he was the person who carried the money to Singh's residence.
The first charge sheet in the matter was filed in August 2011 in which all but Argal were named as accused.
The Delhi Police have filed three supplementary charge sheets and Argal was named as accused in the second supplementary charge sheet.
In the first chargesheet, police had accused Amar Singh and Kulkarni of "conspiring" and "masterminding" the scam to bribe some MPs ahead of the July 22, 2008 confidence vote in Lok Sabha.
All the accused have been booked under various provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act and for criminal conspiracy under the Indian Penal Code.
The case was registered in 2009 on recommendation by a Parliamentary panel which had probed the scam.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 26 2013 | 7:15 PM IST

Next Story