CBI opposes builders plea in PF non-payment case

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Feb 18 2018 | 7:30 PM IST
The CBI has opposed in the Bombay High Court a plea of builder Niranjan Hiranandani seeking to quash the charge sheet filed against him in 2010 in a criminal case of alleged non-payment of provident fund to the tune of Rs 9 crore.
The central agency opposed the plea on the ground that Hiranandani was a key conspirator.
The 61-year-old developer had approached the high court last week to quash and set aside the charge sheet filed against him by the CBI's Anti-Corruption wing in September 2010 under charges of criminal conspiracy, cheating and sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
In his plea, he claimed it was a vexatious prosecution and that there was no material to support allegations of him defrauding the provident fund office.
CBI lawyer Hiten Venegaonkar, however, opposed the plea and said Hiranandani was the main conspirator.
"The statement of witnesses, including the petitioners employees, EPF consultants, point to his involvement in the offence. The witnesses have said that fake employee names and a bogus register was prepared at the behest of and in consultation with the petitioner," Venegaonkar argued.
He added that since the charge sheet has been filed, the developer has the remedy of filing an application seeking discharge before the trial court and hence, this petition should be dismissed.
A division bench of Acting Chief Justice V K Tahilramani and Justice M S Karnik after hearing arguments in the case reserved its order on the petition.
Hiranandani had approached the high court after a co-accused K Gopalan was discharged from the case.
According to the prosecution, the Hiranandani Group had not deposited provident fund of their employees between the years 2003 to 2006.
The alleged non-payment, as per a report submitted by the Employee Provident Fund Organisation in its departmental enquiry, was to the tune of Rs 9.36 crore.
Apart from Hiranandani, two employees of the group and four officers from the EPFO have been arraigned as accused in the case.
Following the EPFOs report, the CBI lodged an FIR in the case in March 2008.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 18 2018 | 7:30 PM IST

Next Story