CCI disposes of case against cine employees federation, others

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 26 2018 | 6:00 PM IST

The Competition Commission has disposed of a complaint alleging unfair business practices against Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) and its 20 affiliates with regard to certain directives including fixation of wages.

The complaint was filed by Indian Motion Picture Producers' Association.

It was alleged that FWICE and its 20 affiliates issued directives to the complainant and its members in contravention of the provisions of Section 3 and 4 of the Competition Act.

FWICE is a federation of different craft associations related with the film industry in Western India (Mumbai-based film and television industry).

While Section 3 of the Competition Act deals with anti-competitive agreements, Section 4 pertains to abuse of dominant market position.

The directives pertained to observing mandatory holidays on second Sunday of every month in addition to a list of holidays for the year 2017 on religious occasions and wage hike of 22 per cent in the wage rate of craftsmen, among others.

Noting that an earlier order of the regulator in a different matter has "already settled" its position on the issues raised in the present complaint, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) disposed of the complaint.

With regard to the circulars directing the producers to observe holidays including festivals and second Sundays of every month, CCI said it has already observed in the earlier case that matter of 'fixing holidays' is not within the domain of the Act.

"With respect to fixation of minimum wages, it was held that though prescribing wages has the effect of fixation of price of services, wages and increment being also a part of conditions of labour/ term of employment can fall within the realm of legitimate trade union activities when it is duly negotiated by a registered trade union. Thus, the same is not anti-competitive," CCI said.

The fair trade regulator said since it has already dealt with the allegations in respect of the conduct of the opposite parties, it is not expected to do the same again and again and deal with successive informations filed for the same conduct against the same parties by separate orders.

Thus, the commission is of the view that no further deliberation upon the allegations is required as they have been dealt with in the earlier decision, CCI said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 26 2018 | 6:00 PM IST

Next Story