CCI rules out unfair trade practices by Religare group firms

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 19 2014 | 7:17 PM IST
Competition Commission has rejected allegations of unfair business practices against diversified group Religare in the market for loans provided by NBFCs in lieu of securities.
A complaint filed by an individual investor alleged that Religare Enterprises, Religare Securities and Religare Finvest were dominant in the market of financing 'certain securities of a value in excess of Rs 20 lakhs' due to which they have been able to dictate terms and impose unfair and discriminatory conditions.
It was also alleged that there was an agreement between the Religare firms in the nature of a 'tie-in arrangement' and 'refusal to deal' for the benefit of the group companies, which was in violation on the competition norms.
While Religare Securities is a brokerage firm, Religare Finvest is an Non-banking Financial Company (NBFC). Religare Enterprises is the holding company of Religare Securities and Religare Finvest.
In an order dated February 5, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) said that "there arises no competition concern actionable under...The (Competition) Act and the case deserves to be closed".
The Commission said that since there are a large number of brokers and NBFCs, Religare was not dominant in the segment concerned.
"When opposite parties (Religare) are not dominant in the relevant market, the question of abuse of dominant position in that relevant market does not arise," CCI said.
The complainant, who opened a trading account with Religare Securities, had alleged that the broker without opening a margin funding account started charging an interest of 18 per cent per annum on delayed payments for trades done.
According to the complainant, for a broker to charge interest on the outstanding amounts due from a client, a 'margin funding' account was required to be opened.
It was also submitted that at the instance of Religare Securities, the complainant used to avail loan against securities/margin funding facilities from Religare Finvest and was not allowed to take loans from a third party.
Further, it was charged that the loan was arbitrarily and abruptly withdrawn by Religare Finvest without a reason.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 19 2014 | 7:17 PM IST

Next Story