It also urged the two states to set up a long-pending Joint Control Board to address water disputes in future, while hinting that the government was open to review the Inter-State Water Disputes Act if states make any suggestions.
"We had called a meeting of representatives of states of Odisha and Chhatisgarh on June 27 to discuss issues concerning projects in Mahanadi basin. However, the same was postponed at the request of Odisha government for a month and now the meeting will be held on July 29," Water Resources Minister Uma Bharati said while replying to a Calling Attention Motion on the issue in Rajya Sabha moved by BJD members.
"We will find a way out and solve the matter. We all love Odisha and we will not do any injustice to Odisha people," she said, while clarifying that the July 29 meeting was scheduled much before the notice for the Calling Attention Motion was given by BJD.
Dissatisfied with the government's response, the BJD members staged a walk out in the Rajya Sabha.
The construction of Kelo dam was approved in 2009. The other three pending projects are -- Tandula Reservior project, Sondur Reservior Project and Detailed Project Report of Arpa Bhaisajhar barrage project, he added.
Balyan said, "We had told the Chhattisgarh government to send these proposals to Odisha government as well."
(Reopen PAR25)
Balyan, who spoke on similar lines in the Lok Sabha where also a Calling Attention Motion on the issue was taken up, said the water disputes between the two states would not have aggravated had they set up a Joint Control Board as per the agreement signed between Odisha and Madhya Pradesh way back in 1983.
"As per the 1983 pact signed between two states, a Joint Control Board was to be set up. So far, it has not been done. It the matter between Odisha and Chhatisgarh. The two states should come forward to set up the Board so that such problems do not arise in future," he said.
He suggested that a study be conducted on the impact of such construction on Odisha during non-monsoon period as during monsoon, there was enough water flow.
Observing that the role of Central Water Commission (CWC) comes only after any state gives notice to the Centre, Balyan said Odisha gave a notice only one and a half months back and since then the Centre has convened meetings.
Stating that water disputes between two states are a matter of concern, Balyan said the Centre is keen to review the Inter-State Water Disputes Act if any suggestions or represenations made by the states.
Tirkey said Chhattisgarh has decided to construct 10 dams on Mahanadi basin, of which 2-3 dams are already constructed. "It is doing without informing Odisha. It is a matter of concern. Flow of water into Odisha would be affected. Our farmers and fishermen would be impacted."
Initiating the debate in Lower House, Mahtab hit out at
He also targeted the central government for giving permission to Chhattisgarh for these projects and asked it for "better and sane" judgement as he spoke in detail how Odisha was losing out on water meant for drinking and irrigation.
"The government (Chhattisgarh) has acted in an illegal manner. We will go to tribunal if necessary," he said.
"The moot question is why the Central Water Commission is flouting the norms... The government should rise to the occassion and do justice to Odisha," he said.
Seeking clarification on the minister's reply, D Raja (CPI) sought to know if the centre plans to come out with a comprehensive policy to address such issues as many states are facing water disputes while citing Cauveri water dispute.
He also sought know how the Centre plans to address the concerns of the downstream states.
A Navneethakrishnan (AIADMK) said the provisions of the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 are not sufficient to address the disputes and sought to know if the government plans to review the Act and bring amendments to it or plans to come out with a new law.
Jairam Ramesh (Cong) said the Chhattisgarh government's four projects are going to affect Odisha. "Has Chhattisgarh government and Union Ministry taken study to complete the environment impact assessment?"
Stating that water is not a technical issue but a political issue, he sought to know if the government would call a meeting of the two state ministers as well as chief ministers.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
