China rejects UN mediation to resolve South China Sea dispute

Image
Press Trust of India Beijing
Last Updated : Dec 07 2014 | 4:20 PM IST
China today rejected UN arbitration to resolve the South China Sea (SCS) maritime dispute with its neighbours, asserting that it should be settled through direct bilateral negotiations.
As the deadline to respond to UN mediation sought by the Philippines to arbitrate its maritime dispute with China over the South China Sea inched close, Beijing today issued a lengthy explanation rejecting international arbitration asserting that it should be settled through direct bilateral negotiations.
A Position Paper issued by the Chinese Foreign Ministry alleged that the Philippines is attempting to resolve the dispute through "compulsory arbitration" by the UN Convention on Law of the Seas (UNCLOS), without exercising the option to settle it through direct talks.
The Philippines had approached the UN body last year questioning China's claims to the Spratly islands, called Nansha islands by Beijing, and the waters around them.
The paper was released as a UN Arbitral Tribunal appointed to deal with the case has asked China to submit its counter-memorial before December 15.
About China's approach to resolution of border disputes, Xu Hong, Director-General of the Department of Treaty and Law of the Foreign Ministry said "China has settled its land boundary with almost all of its neighbours (except India and Bhutan) and has delimited its maritime boundary in Beibu Bay with Vietnam".
China has settled disputes with 12 of the 14 countries with which it shares borders. Boundary disputes remain only with India and Bhutan.
Rejecting the legality of the arbitration, Xu told a briefing here today that sovereignty issue is completely beyond the scope of the Convention.
"China and the Philippines have reached agreement to settle their relevant disputes through negotiation. And China has never accepted any compulsory procedures for the relevant disputes," he said accusing Philippines of "abusing" the compulsory procedures provided in the Convention.
"Such a practice is and should be frowned upon internationally. By refusing to accept or participate in the arbitration initiated by the Philippines, China is defending its sovereign right to choose a means of dispute settlement of its free will. Our decision is an exercise of the rights we enjoy under international law, and is well founded on international law," he said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 07 2014 | 4:20 PM IST

Next Story