"We are not happy with this Manodhairya scheme. It is insulting, inhuman and shameful. There has been no application of mind while formulating this scheme.
"It is just an empty formality. This is a very sorry state of affairs," a division bench of Chief Justice Manjula Chellur and Justice G S Kulkarni said.
The court was hearing a petition filed by a 14-year-old girl, who claims to be a victim of rape, seeking compensation of Rs three lakh under the scheme.
"Look at the state of Goa. It gives Rs 10 lakh compensation. We expect Maharashtra to also be progressive and positive.
"We direct our order and all other relevant judgments passed by the Supreme Court in the past on this issue to be placed before the state chief secretary so that he can make some progress and take some laudable decision in the matter within four weeks," the court noted.
Under the scheme launched in October 2013, the state government gives a compensation of up to Rs three lakh to victims of rape and other crimes against women.
During the hearing, the bench was informed by the state government that the scheme has two categories -- the first for rape and sexual assault victims and the second for acid attack victims. Rs two lakh is given to victims of the first category and Rs three lakh for the second category.
The court said the clauses have been framed with no application of mind and these lack empathy towards the victims.
"What about child victims? Is Rs two lakh enough for them? In a place like Bombay what will a child do with Rs two lakh. They will not even get proper education," it said.
The court asked if the government was giving publicity to
the scheme so that more people become aware of it.
"Are the police informing the victims at the time of recording their statement about the scheme?" Justice Kulkarni said
To this, Chief Justice Chellur remarked, "First the police need to speak politely to the victims. Such cases should be handled by women officers."
"What is this ? Complete non-application of mind. What if a girl suffers injuries to her limbs and is not able to use her hands or not walk...Is Rs 50,000 enough for her? The government is bothered only about the face," the court said.
"Similarly in cases of child victims, the government has to think about the entire life of the child," the bench said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
