Court acquits man, father of charge of murdering relative

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 04 2017 | 2:22 PM IST
A man and his father have been acquitted of the charge of murdering a relative by a Delhi court, which said their conduct does not point towards their involvement in the crime.
The court gave benefit of doubt to the two men, residents of Sabzi Mandi area in central Delhi, and freed them saying the prosecution has not been able to prove the case.
"It is matter of common knowledge that whenever any victim is brought to hospital, the authorities themselves set the law into motion by informing the police. When the accused persons removed the victim to hospital, they must be knowing that the matter shall come to notice of police.
"Had they been involved in the commission of crime, they would not have thought of removing the victim to hospital and rather taken steps to screen themselves," Special Judge Narinder Kumar said.
According to the prosecution, the incident took place on the night of October 22, 2011, when the victim had gone to his in-law's house in Central Delhi and the accused man and his father shot him dead.
The victim had married the man's sister in 2008 and was having a matrimonial dispute with his wife which was later on settled by the crime against women cell in 2011.
A murder case was registered after the victim's mother was informed by the police about his death at a hospital here.
During the trial, both the men denied the allegations levelled against them and claimed false implication.
The court, in its judgement, said it was true that two pistols and a knife were recovered from the house of the accused persons but no finger print could be lifted from any of these weapons.
"Had finger prints been lifted from the pistols or the knife, then the things would have been otherwise. Prosecution has not led any evidence to suggest that the accused persons removed finger prints from the pistol and the knife before or after removal of the victim from the spot to the hospital.
"Rather conduct of the accused persons reveal that they intended to rush the victim to hospital immediately to save his life. Otherwise, they would not have immediately rushed him to hospital soon after the occurrence," it said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 04 2017 | 2:22 PM IST

Next Story