Court fines accused for being absent from hearing

Image
Press Trust of India Thane
Last Updated : Oct 26 2014 | 11:40 AM IST
Taking serious view of absence without a legal ground of an accused in a case, a local court has fined him Rs 2,000 for holding up the court work.
Additional Sessions Judge V K Shewale fined the accused, who was to appear in the court recently but remained absent, Rs 2,000 and also asked him to pay a compensation of Rs 1,000 each to the two witnesses (both businessmen from Vashi area of Navi Mumbai), who were present in the court for the deposition.
The accused had filed an application seeking adjournment saying he is unable to attend the case due to some unavoidable circumstances.
Doubting the application, the judge noted, "The very ground of adjournment is fishy and thereby unsustainable under law. Hence, I have called upon the defence to proceed with the case, without challenging the identity of absent accused, who prima facie appears to have absented without any legal ground."
On this plight, it is the duty of every court officer either to keep the accused present or to proceed with the case without challenging the identity. However, defence advocate refused to proceed with the case and harped on adjournment. In such manner, the court work is held up, the judge observed.
"It is the prime duty of every court to guard the right of witnesses who are appearing in court by leaving their daily pursuits. It is common experience that by hook or crook adjournments are sought and thereby witnesses are sent back twice-thrice so that they get fed up with the procedure adopted by courts, due to the groundless applications submitted by defence for adjournment," he further observed.
Hence, under such circumstances, at least witnesses need to be compensated, so that there can be some relief to them for their attendance in court by leaving their pursuits.
Granting the accused a day's exemption, the court warned, "On next date if the accused absented, his personal bond will be forfeited, then NBW, recovery warrant notice to the surety will be followed and thereafter case will proceed by keeping the accused in judicial custody till conclusion of the case.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 26 2014 | 11:40 AM IST

Next Story