Court refuses to make Centre a party to suit against websites

Administrative Civil Judge Praveen Singh also dismissed the plea to review his order for dropping Google India and others from the list of parties against whom the suit had been filed by one Mufti Aijaz Arshad Qasmi.

The judge also imposed a cost of Rs 10,000 on Qasmi for filing, what the court said, was frivolous pleas leading to the wastage of court's time.

Qasmi had said Centre should be made a co-plaintiff "for proper adjudication of the suit as it related to public, religious and national issues."

The judge, however, said, "The application of the plaintiff is devoid of merits. The application has been filed without disclosing any ground on how and why Union of India is a necessary party.

"No court and no litigant can force anyone to prosecute a lis (dispute) or become a plaintiff or pursue a lis as a plaintiff or petitioner before the court," the judge said.

Qasmi had also sought review of the court's April 12 order by which Google India, Youtube India, Orkut India and Blogspot India were dropped from the list of parties against whom the suit had been filed.

The court had dropped them as parties to the suit after Qasmi and his counsel Santosh Pandey had stated they had no objection to their being dropped.

In their plea, seeking their restoration as parties, they had said they had given their no objection for deletion of the names of Google India and the other three parties "inadvertently" and due to some "confusion."

"The act of plaintiff was not the act of an uninformed, unassisted litigant but was a decision arrived at after due discussion with his counsel," the judge said and added there was no new ground for the court to review its earlier order. (More)