In its petition in the Principal Sessions Court, Ernakulam, police had sought permission to take blood samples of the accused to conduct DNA test on them to compare saliva sample from the cigarette butt collected from a flat from where they were taken into custody.
Police argued that it was necessary to scientifically prove that the actor and the women were using cocaine cigarettes.
The court cited a Supreme Court judgement which says that the consent of the accused was required for taking their blood samples and rejected the police's petition.
Police sought fresh permission from the court after the preliminary tests conducted on the blood samples collected from the accused failed to detect any trace of drugs.
Blood samples collected from the accused along with the cigarette butts found in the flat were sent to a local laboratory in Kochi for examination.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
