DDCA controversy: HC seeks Jaitley stand on Kejriwal plea

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 09 2017 | 12:28 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today sought response of Finance Minister Arun Jaitley on Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's plea to expunge remarks made against him by a trial court in a criminal defamation case filed by the BJP leader.
Jaitley had filed the criminal defamation complaint alleging that the accused, including Ashutosh, Kumar Vishwas, Sanjay Singh, Raghav Chaddha and Deepak Bajpai apart from Kejriwal, had defamed him in a controversy regarding Delhi and District Cricket Association (DDCA) when he headed it for over a decade.
A civil defamation suit has also been filed by Jaitley against them in the Delhi High Court in the matter seeking Rs 10 crore as damages.
Justice Mukta Gupta today issued notice to Jaitley and sought his stand regarding Kejriwal's plea against the trial court's remarks made while dismissing his application seeking to be heard on the point of framing of notice in the case.
The high court will take up this matter on July 13.
The trial court, while dismissing the application filed by Kejriwal and the five Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders, had said the plea was "bereft of any merit, mala fide and filed solely with a view to stall" the proceedings.
The trial court had dismissed their application on January 30, 2017.
Kejriwal has also moved another application claiming that some of the alleged remarks attributed to him and other AAP leaders by Jaitley in his criminal defamation case were not defamatory.
It was contended by Kejriwal's lawyers that the remarks attributed to him were taken from news publications and social media extracts.
However, as these news reports or social media extracts had not been filed by Kejriwal's lawyer, the court gave them time till May 22 to file the documents in support of their plea.
The second plea would be taken up for hearing by the court on May 22.
In his first plea, Kejriwal had also challenged the trial court's January 30 order, in which the remarks were made, but his lawyers decided to give up that prayer saying they would file a separate petition on the issue.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 09 2017 | 12:28 PM IST

Next Story