Departmental proceedings against Jaya in IT case withdrawn

Final orders were passed by department on accepting the compounding fee

Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Jan 08 2015 | 12:29 PM IST
The Income Tax departmental proceedings against AIADMK chief Jayalalithaa and her close aide Sasikala in four cases have come to an end, as the final orders were passed by department on accepting the compounding fee.

When the case came up for hearing today, J Karuppiah, the counsel appearing for Jayalalithaa and others informed the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court through a memo that the final orders were passed by the department on the compounding fee.

Public Prosecutor for IT department K Ramasamy said he was filing a petition to withdraw the case.

Also Read

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate R Dakshinamurthy posted the matter for 3 p.m today for passing final orders.

On December one last year, Jayalalithaa and Sasikala in their individual capacities and a firm in which they are partners have together paid Rs 1.99 crore as compounding fee, setting in motion the process for the closure of the 19-year-old case against them.

While Jayalalithaa paid Rs 30,83,887 lakh, Sasikala paid Rs 28,07,972 to compound alleged offences under Income Tax Act for non-compliance in filing annual tax returns, both for the 1993-94 assessment year, a court here was apprised today.

Sasi Enterprises paid Rs 75,33,330 and Rs 65,67,872 as compounding fee for 1991-92 and 1992-93 assessment years.

Taken together, a fee of Rs 1,99,90,000 has been remitted in favour of tax authorities to compound alleged offences.

A request to compound offences were made on June 25 last year year to tax authorities by Jayalalithaa, Sasikala and Sasi Enterprises.

The Income Tax department's Regional Compounding Committee in its November 26 meeting last year, decided to accept the request, subject to remittance of the stipulated fee. On November 27, the payments were made.

The case has been going on at the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Egmore here.

The Income Tax department had launched criminal proceedings against Jayalalithaa and Sasikala for allegedly not filing returns in their individual capacity for the assessment year 1993-94.

Complaints were also filed by the IT department against Sasi Enterprises represented by its partners, Jayalalithaa and Sasikala for allegedly failing to file returns for the assessment years 1991-92 and 1992-93.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 08 2015 | 12:05 PM IST

Next Story