Justice C.T.Selvam of the Madurai Bench, dismissing a petition filed by the man, whose former wife had initiated the proceedings, said the Supreme Court had held that the conduct of a man even prior to enactment of the PWDVA could be taken into account by the court concerned before passing orders in the proceedings.
Hence the petitioner's submission that proceedings initiated in the capacity of being the wife of the alleged offender could not be allowed to continue after the woman had lost that status, was not acceptable, the judge said.
The petitioner's counsel said the definition of "aggrieved person" does not contain the crucial words at "any point of time". Hence the past relationship should be excluded. But the judge rejected the argument.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
