DMDK founder plea to transfer to SC cases he filed challenging

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Dec 09 2014 | 10:40 PM IST
DMDK founder Vijayakant today moved the Madras High Court to transfer to the Supreme Court all cases he filed challenging the constitutional validity of Section 499 and 500 of IPC, which paves the way for the state government to file defamation cases.
A batch of petitions, filed by Vijayakant and his wife to declare these sections as unconstitutional, including Sec 299 CrPc on the validity of the above and Sec 199 CrPc,empowering the state government to issue a G.O to file defamation cases, came up before the first bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice M Sathyanarayanan today.
Vijayakant's counsel K M Vijayan submitted that a similar petition was pending before the Supreme Court and hence sought a direction to transfer all the cases to the Supreme Court.
Meanwhile, the Joint Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Jai Prakash Agarwal filed a counter affidavit, submitting that the constitutionality of Sect 199 of CrPc must be decided by the court and that "neither the petitioners nor the authorities have anything to do therewith."
He also said CrPC are implemented by state governments and the concerned governments should follow it in letter and spirit. Any misuse of its provisions by the state authority may be replied to by the state government concerned, he submitted.
Agarwal said provision 199(2) of CrPc enabled the government to step in to maintain confidence in purity of administration when high dignitaries and other public servants are wrongly defamed.
He also submitted Sec 199 of Crpc provided necessary safeguards for the accused. Moreover, Sec 499 is elaborate and provides 10 exceptions for the offence of defamation.
"Section 199 of Crpc is just, fair and constitutional and does not violate any fundamental rights enshrined by the Constitution," he said.
Hence he prayed for dismissal of all the petitions filed by Vijayakant and others as devoid of merit.
After going through the counter and hearing Vijayan, the bench said "it is more or less agreed that the issue in question raised in these writ petitions is pending consideration before Supreme Court."
"The prayer in the petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution is to declare Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Section 199 Crpc as unconstitutional. In view of the aforesaid, it is stated that the parties will move a transfer petition before the Honourable Supreme Court."
The bench then directed the matters for further direction to be listed on February 17, 2015.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 09 2014 | 10:40 PM IST

Next Story