Doesn't Centre think unrest needs to be quelled quickly: HC

Image
Press Trust of India Kolkata
Last Updated : Jul 07 2017 | 5:02 PM IST
The Calcutta High Court today sought to know if the Centre did not think the Darjeeling hills stir for a separate Gorkhaland needed to be quelled quickly, given the strategic location of the area.
"Given the geopolitical area in which it lies, doesn't the Centre think this agitation be quelled immediately?," asked acting Chief Justice Nishita Mhatre while hearing a plea for restoration of normalcy in the Darjeeling hills.
The court posed the query amid the Indian Armed forces being locked in a eyeball to eyeball standoff with the Chinese army at Dokalam at the Bhutan tri-junction, not too far from Darjeeling.
The division bench of acting Chief Justice Mhatre and Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty directed the West Bengal government officials to sit with the Ministry of Home Affairs to sort out the requirements for para-military forces on the basis of ground conditions.
Expressing displeasure at the state and the Centre sparring over requirement of Central Armed Police Force (CAPF) in the restive Darjeeling hills, the bench observed, "The situation can improve only if both of you sit together and sort out the issues."
The court asked the Centre and the state government to reach a meaningful understanding over CAPF requirement before July 11, when the matter would be heard next.
Normal life has been affected severely in Darjeeling and Kalimpong due to the ongoing indefinite shutdown enforced by the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha (GJM) and some other hill parties since June 15 over a separate statehood demand.
Incidents of arson have been going on in different parts of the hills since June eight.
Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Kaushik Chanda told the court that 11 companies of CAPF have been provided for Darjeeling and Kalimpong districts in the hills.
Stating that the CAPF deployment was sufficient for the two districts, Chanda said maintaining law and order was primarily the state government's responsibility.
He said eight companies of CAPF were sent to Basirhat in North 24 Parganas district of the state, which has been facing communal strife since last Monday.
"There are requirements of CAPF in other parts of the country also for various reasons, including for the ongoing Amarnath Yatra," Chanda said.
Appearing for West Bengal government, Advocate General Kishore Dutta submitted that the state had not asked for any additional force, but only sought replacement of six CAPF companies for operational reasons.
The state government through a communique to the Centre on June 30 had sought replacement of three women companies of the CRPF with three male companies and replacement of three SSB companies with those of the CRPF or RAF.
No lawyer represented Gorkha Janmukti Morcha president Bimal Gurung or his party, which is spearheading the movement for a separate state of Gorkhaland to be carved out of West Bengal.
The bench also asked as to why the CBI has taken no steps to ensure that Gurung, his wife Asha and several others accused in the killing of All India Gorkha League leader Madan Tamang were made to stay in Kolkata from the date of framing of charge in the case till completion of the trial, as was directed by another division bench of the high court.
While granting bail to these accused on December 19, 2016, a division bench of Justice Asim Kumar Roy had directed them to stay in Kolkata police area during the said period.
Counsel Indranil Roy submitted that Gurung had appeared before the trial court in January when hearing in the matter commenced but did not appear before it on eight dates after that.
The ASG submitted that the magistrate had allowed his plea for not appearing in person on those dates.
At this, the acting chief justice asked, "How is it that CBI did not oppose it ... This man is not available in court and CBI doesn't bother?"
The trial in the case had been transferred from Darjeeling to Kolkata by the Supreme Court on a plea by Tamang's widow that the accused persons could influence witnesses.
Hearing on framing of charges against the accused persons, who have also prayed for dismissal of charges against them, is fixed before the trial court on July 24.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 07 2017 | 5:02 PM IST

Next Story