DPCC also submitted its action plan for tackling the issue of poor air quality, in which it has detailed the steps being taken to address the various causes of air pollution.
Advocate Sanjeev Ralli, appearing for DPCC, made the submission before a bench of justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva during the hearing of a PIL initiated by the court on the issue of rising air pollution in the city.
The bench, however, was not satisfied and said under the Air Act, the committee had the power to initiate prosecution and shut down the sites that continue to violate norms.
It also said the Rs 50,000 fine was not a deterrent as after paying the amount a person would keep on violating. DPCC agreed with this view and said it will take steps to shut down projects which repeatedly violate the norms.
On burning of leaves, garbage, plastic and rubble, DPCC said a fine of Rs 5000 is levied upon those found violating and added that it was also keeping a close watch on MCD dump sites to prevent burning of waste.
DPCC said the units were ordered to be shut down as their
emissions were not within prescribed norms, prompting the court to surmise that these plants were "not being run efficiently".
It asked DPCC to "ensure the thermal power plants have the werewithal to operate within the standards and if not, then don't let them (units) run".
It also told the court that the forest department had taken up over 800 hectares of flood plain area in east Delhi and converted into a forest area and added that DDA has been approached to hand over any other such lands for conversion to forest areas.
The court, thereafter, directed the Delhi Development Authority's lawyer to take instructions on whether any land owned by it is in the flood plain and whether it can be handed over to forest department to be maintained as a forest area to prevent unauthorised constructions and improve air quality.
Meanwhile, an intervention application was moved by a woman seeking action against open kitchens and non-conforming commercial kitchens, like dhabas, roadside eateries and sweet shops, saying such establishments gave out "fugitive emissions" which were very harmful not only for people outside but for those inside their homes and offices.
The court allowed the woman to intervene and listed the matter with the main PIL on January 28.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
