Susan Avery, an atmospheric physicist and former president of the famed Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, will join the board of the petroleum giant on February 1, the company announced yesterday.
Avery's research priorities have included climate variability, and she has said that "Clearly climate science is telling us (to) get off fossil fuels as much as possible."
She has a "keen interest in scientific literacy and the role of science in public policy," according to the website for Woods Hole, which is based in the northeastern state of Massachusetts.
ExxonMobil has dismissed the reports as biased, but faces government investigations over the controversy.
Earlier this month, a Massachusetts court ruled the oil giant must turn over 40 years of documents on climate change, in a win for Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, who has described the probe as a fraud investigation.
Environmentalists were not overly impressed with Avery's appointment.
Shanna Cleveland of Ceres, a nonprofit that works on shareholder actions designed to pressure companies to address climate change, called the move a "really good first step, but not much more than that."
Cleveland said there was a risk Avery could be a "lone vote in the wilderness" on climate change given ExxonMobil's record on the issue. The goal now is "leveling up the entire board with the information they need to assess climate risk."
Cleveland has been among the activists who have trekked to ExxonMobil's headquarters near Dallas for investor votes each year. Environmentalists last year lost several key votes on climate change, but did prevail on one resolution that would have allowed shareholders to nominate their own candidates to the board.
"We wouldn't have given Philip Morris a pass for putting a doctor on their board and we aren't going to let Exxon off the hook either," 350.Org said in a statement. "Exxon lied, people died, and they must be held accountable."
The appointment of a climate scientist to the oil company's board comes as environmentalists gird for combat with the Trump administration, whose pick to head the Environmental Protection Agency, Scott Pruitt, is a climate skeptic.
A group of scientists this week announced plans for a "Scientists' March on Washington," although no date has been set.
"Politicians who devalue expertise risk making decisions that do not reflect reality and must be held accountable. Politicians who devalue expertise risk making decisions that do not reflect reality and must be held accountable.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
