Fresh summons issued to SpiceJet, Kalanithi Maran in IT cases

The court directed the three accused to appear before it on September 21

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 21 2015 | 7:15 PM IST
A Delhi court today issued fresh summons to budget carrier SpiceJet Ltd, its former Chairman Kalanithi Maran and an erstwhile top official in two tax evasion cases for their alleged failure to deposit over Rs 147 crore TDS with the Income Tax (IT) Department.

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Pritam Singh again issued summons to Maran, the firm and its then Managing Director S Natrajhen as the earlier summons were not served on the accused, who did not appear today.

The court directed the three accused to appear before it on September 21.

ALSO READ: SC stays Maran bail cancellation till Sept, gives govt a big rap


"Summons issued to the accused not received back. Issue fresh summons to all the accused through Police Station Sabzi Mandi ... Put up for appearance of accused on September 21," the court said.

Advocate Brijesh Garg, appearing for the IT Department, told the court that the matter was listed for appearance of the accused but neither has anyone from their side appeared nor has any report been received on the summons.

The court had on July 21 issued summons to the firm, Maran and Natrajhen and directed them to appear today after taking cognizance of two IT complaints filed against them.

It had said that prima facie commission of an offence was disclosed under sections 276B (if a person fails to pay to the credit of central government the tax deducted at source by him), 278B (offences by companies) read with section 278E (presumption as to culpable mental state) of the Income Tax Act for financial year 2013-14 and 2014-15.

The IT Department filed the two complaints against the three accused with identical allegations and said a survey under the Act was conducted at the business premises of the company on August 4 last year.

The department said that during the survey, it was found that the company had made payments to its deductees and deducted TDS against various payments to the tune of Rs 110.6 crore during the financial year 2013-14, but had failed to deposit the TDS amount within the given time-frame.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 21 2015 | 4:42 PM IST

Next Story