Gandhi killing: Savarkar kin to move HC to drop parts of probe

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Jan 22 2016 | 9:48 PM IST
The grandson of V D Savarkar will move the Bombay High Court seeking direction for deletion of "adverse reference" made by a Commission which probed the conspiracy behind Mahatma Gandhi's assassination, claiming the observation tarnishes his image.
Ranjit Savarkar said the inquiry commission, headed by Justice Jivanlal Kapur, had wrongly described Gandhi's killers Nathuram Godse and Narayan Apte as Savarkar's followers.
Ranjit today said he will file a suit in the HC demanding dropping of chapter 25 in the report of the panel, constituted to unearth conspiracy behind the assassination.
In this chapter, Kapur observed Investigation Officer J D Nagarwala had neglected the available evidence while investigating the conspiracy. A statement in the report, which runs into hundreds of pages, is often used by Savarkar's detractors to brand him as the main conspirator behind Gandhi's murder though Kapur had exonerated him of conspiracy charges for want of corroborative evidence, he said.
The Commission was formed six months after Savarkar's death in February 1966. It submitted report in November 1969.
Ranjit said this sentence in the report was an observation and not conclusion.
"Kapur had irresponsibly written the sentence. He deliberately called Nathuram Godse and Narayan Apte as Veer Savarkar's followers. The fact is he had snapped ties with Godse two years before the assassination (on Jan 30, 1948)."
This observation tarnishes Savarkar's image as a great patriot, he said.
He said he was keen to moderate the Kapur Commission's report because he wanted to expose the Congress' "conspiracy" to defame Savarkar.
He claimed the law permitted removal of certain portions of a judicial commission report if concrete evidence is produced to establish they are incorrect.
"The Commission report was not available in digital format. We have digitised it now. I have consulted legal advisors. They have asked me to go ahead with the suit," Ranjit said, without specifying when he will file the suit.
Asked about the Shiv Sena's demand for conferring Bharat Ratna on Savarkar, Ranjit said neither his family nor the Savarkar National Trust was pitching for the country's highest civilian award for him.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 22 2016 | 9:48 PM IST

Next Story