Geoengineering the climate could reduce vital rains

Image
Press Trust of India Washington
Last Updated : Nov 01 2013 | 5:11 PM IST
Attempts to geoengineer the climate in order to lower greenhouse gases in the atmosphere could reduce vital rains in several parts of the world, including East Asia, a new study has found.
Although a significant build-up in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere would alter worldwide precipitation patterns, a widely discussed technological approach to reduce future global warming would also interfere with rainfall and snowfall, researchers said.
The international study, led by scientists at the National Centre for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), finds that global warming caused by a massive increase in greenhouse gases would spur a nearly seven per cent average increase in precipitation compared to preindustrial conditions.
However, trying to resolve the problem through "geoengineering" could result in monsoonal rains in North America, East Asia, and other regions dropping by 5-7 per cent compared to preindustrial conditions.
Globally, average precipitation could decrease by about 4.5 per cent, the study found.
"Geoengineering the planet doesn't cure the problem," said NCAR scientist Simone Tilmes, lead author of the study.
"Even if one of these techniques could keep global temperatures approximately balanced, precipitation would not return to preindustrial conditions," said Tilmes.
As concerns have mounted about climate change, scientists have studied geoengineering approaches to reduce future warming.
Some of these would capture carbon dioxide before it enters the atmosphere. Others would attempt to essentially shade the atmosphere by injecting sulfate particles into the stratosphere or launching mirrors into orbit with the goal of reducing global surface temperatures.
The new study focuses on the second set of approaches, those that would shade the planet. The authors warn, however, that Earth's climate would not return to its pre-industrial state even if the warming itself were successfully mitigated.
"It's very much a pick-your-poison type of problem," said John Fasullo, a co-author.
"If you don't like warming, you can reduce the amount of sunlight reaching the surface and cool the climate. But if you do that, large reductions in rainfall are unavoidable. There's no win-win option here," said Fasullo.
The study appears in the Journal of Geophysical Research.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 01 2013 | 5:11 PM IST

Next Story