"In our considered opinion, they (Google, Yahoo and Microsoft) are under obligation to see that the 'doctrine of auto block' is applied within a reasonable period of time. It is difficult to accept the submission that once it is brought to their notice, they will do the needful. It need not be over emphasised that it has to be an in-house procedure/method to be introduced by the companies, and we do direct," a bench of Justices Dipak Misra and C Nagappan said.
He told the bench that all the three companies have developed a technique called "auto block" which prohibits advertisements on sex determination the moment any "advertisement or search" is introduced in the online system.
"If any person tries to avail the corridors of these companies, this device shall be adopted so that no one can enter/see the said advertisement or message or anything that is prohibited under the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994, specifically under Section 22 of the said Act," the bench said.
Advocate Sanjay Parikh, appearing for petitioner Dr Sabu Mathew George seeking court's intervention in view of decreasing sex ratio, however contended that the Centre should take more steps to see that the law of the land was completely obeyed by these three companies and the commitment given by them are fully followed.
During the hearing, the lawyers appearing for the online
search engines informed the apex court that if anyone fed any of the proposed 43 keywords, the principle of 'auto block' would be immediately applied and such advertisements and messages would not be shown.
The bench directed the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare to file an affidavit on the issue and posted the matter for hearing on November 16.
Meanwhile, in a statement, a Google spokesperson said "in compliance with the requirements of local laws in India, we do not allow advertisements for the promotion of preconception or pre-natal sex determination and selection. We have always taken prompt and effective action in case a violation is reported to us.
Earlier, the apex court had pulled up online search engines for failing to check advertisements pertaining to pre -natal sex determination saying they patently violated law.
It had asked the Centre to say how and what steps should be taken to control advertisements on sex determination tests on the search engines.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
