Guj govt snooping on woman extended to Karnataka: Website

The new tapes contradict the claims made by Gujarat government that the woman was merely being "provided security" during her visits to Gujarat

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/cat.mhtml?searchterm=online%20snooping&search_group=&lang=en&&search_source=related_searches#id=11145616&src=-aozjfaa6imTCppPGXUaPw-1-40" target="_blank">snooping</a> via Shutterstock
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 25 2013 | 5:36 PM IST
The snooping of a woman allegedly at the behest of Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi was not confined to Gujarat but extended to Karnataka as well, according to an investigative portal, contradicting the claims of the BJP government.

The portal, gulail.Com, has released a set of fresh 39 tapes, which contained purported conversation between between two senior Gujarat police officials, G L Singhal and A K Sharma, about the spying on the woman.

The website, which along with another portal cobrapost.Com had first exposed the matter, said Gujarat police had in 2009 contacted its Karnataka counterpart during the Chief Ministership of B S Yedyurrapa for intercepting the telephone of the particular woman in Bangalore where she lived.

The Karnataka government, however, turned down the request, saying due procedures were not followed and that "the order had been signed by a junior officer who was not even authorised to issue phone-tapping instructions".

According to the claims by the websites, the snooping was being undertaken at the behest of 'saheb', an apparent reference to Modi. In some of the tapes, the then state Home Minister and Modi's close aide Amit Shah is purportedly heard referring to 'saheb' repeatedly.

"The Gujarat police not only circumvented the process for tapping of phones, some junior officers of the state home department directly ordered the telecom companies to carry out illegal surveillance," the website has claimed.

It said the move was in clear violation of Indian Telegraph Rule 419 (A) and the Gujarat Government's own notification (dated 29th March 1997), which clearly state that a phone can be tapped only with the written authorisation of the Union Home Secretary or state Home Secretary.

The new tapes contradict the claims made by Gujarat government that the woman was merely being "provided security" during her visits to Gujarat at the request of her father.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 25 2013 | 5:20 PM IST

Next Story