HC allows 3 power cos to withdraw bid for coal mines

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 09 2017 | 8:49 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today allowed three power companies to withdraw their bids for coal blocks and asked the Centre to refund their bid security without any penalty.
The court gave the direction saying the companies had not been informed about the cap on fixed charge component of electricity rate prior to the auction.
A bench of justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva said that had the government informed the companies about the cap on fixed charge prior to the auction, it would have impacted the bidding and the viability of the coal mines as the economics would have changed.
The fixed charge component includes depreciation, return on equity, interest on loan, operation and management costs and interest on working capital.
The companies, Monnet Power, Mandakini Exploration and Jaiprakash Power Ventures, had challenged the Ministry of Power's April 15, 2015, decision to put a cap on the fixed charge component of electricity tariff generated by companies which were declared as the successful bidders for the coal mines earmarked for the power sector.
The companies had also sought an alternative relief, that they be allowed to withdraw their bids and their bid security be refunded.
The bench said that the tender conditions for the auction of the mines made clear stipulations with regard to energy charges and what could be passed through and what could not.
"But, the tender conditions were silent on fixed charges. Therefore, it would not be unreasonable to assume that when the petitioners made their bids in the auction, they would not have contemplated that the fixed charges/capacity charges would be subjected to a ceiling or a cap.
"It would, therefore, not be wrong to observe that had the tender condition clearly indicated that there would be or could be a ceiling on fixed charges/capacity charges, the bids might have been entirely different as the economics would have changed," the court said.
The bench said that in its view the companies were not aware, prior to placing of the bid, that there would be a cap on the fixed charge component, so they "would be entitled to the alternative prayer of withdrawing from the bids and for refund of the bid security without any penalty".

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 09 2017 | 8:49 PM IST

Next Story