HC asks prosecutor to reply to '84-riots victims claim against

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 15 2015 | 8:13 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today asked a public prosecutor appearing in the 1984 anti-Sikh riot case to file reply to the victims' plea seeking transfer of a related case to another court alleging that the evidence was not being properly recorded.
Justice Siddharth Mridul, who had stayed the trial court proceedings in the case allegedly involving Congress leader Sajjan Kumar, directed Special Public Prosecutor D P Singh to file his personal affidavit commenting on the allegation against the judge in the petition filed by complainant Joginder Singh.
The court's order came after CBI supported the plea by Singh who said "the transfer of the case is imperative for meeting the ends of justice".
After taking note of CBI's submission, the court has now asked the prosecutor in the case to file his response in personal capacity.
Besides replying to the victims' allegation, the judge had asked him to responsd within two weeks to senior advocate H S Phoolka's claim in his affidavit, filed in support of Singh, that the correct version of the witness was not recorded.
While orally observing that 1984 issue is an old issue and has been simmering since so many years, it needs closure, the judge fixed the matter for further hearing on November 30.
Sajjan Kumar, co-accused Brahmanand Gupta and Ved Prakash, who were asked to respond to Singh's allegation, opposed Singh's contention and said "such frivolous application, which is politically motivated, for transfer must be checked to ensure that ends of justice are not defeated" and the plea should have been moved before the trial court itself.
The complainant has alleged that the presiding officer "on his own interpreted" what prosecution witness Sheela Kaur had said during recording of her evidence.
Deposing as a prosecution witness, Kaur had on September 10 told the trial court that she had seen Kumar allegedly addressing the crowd and instigating the mob to kill them.
Kumar, Gupta and Prakash are facing trial on charges of murder and rioting in the killing of Surjit Singh in Sultanpuri area of West Delhi.
The court had in July 2010 framed charges, including of murder and rioting, against Kumar, Gupta, Peeriya, Khushal Singh and Ved Prakash in connection with Surjit's killing in the riots. Accused Khushal Singh and Peeriya have since died.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 15 2015 | 8:13 PM IST

Next Story